This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
web:accesswebstories:access_webapp_stories [2018/10/11 17:09] mikeclapp [Story 6 Mapping integration] |
web:accesswebstories:access_webapp_stories [2018/10/17 22:10] (current) mikeclapp [Story 5 Support for Advanced SmartTrack - Pictures] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
====== Story 5 Support for Advanced SmartTrack - Pictures ====== | ====== Story 5 Support for Advanced SmartTrack - Pictures ====== | ||
+ | * Creation of Breadcrumb Header | ||
* Track Notes in Journal and visible on timeline bar | * Track Notes in Journal and visible on timeline bar | ||
* Export of GE KMZ supporting notes and segmenting | * Export of GE KMZ supporting notes and segmenting | ||
Line 94: | Line 95: | ||
I'm also looking at the current SmartPlan implementation for presentation clues on the web. The bigger screen allows us to show deeper on a single screen but we can organize the same with dedicated sorts. Edits will be popups rather than switching pages for a more seamless look. Experimenting with preview style windows that allow edits right there as well (undecided until I determine the presentation priorities) | I'm also looking at the current SmartPlan implementation for presentation clues on the web. The bigger screen allows us to show deeper on a single screen but we can organize the same with dedicated sorts. Edits will be popups rather than switching pages for a more seamless look. Experimenting with preview style windows that allow edits right there as well (undecided until I determine the presentation priorities) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Do we allow renaming of machines? I think not. If we did what would the behaviour be? Renaming old ones ** | ||
** | ** | ||
Line 99: | Line 102: | ||
**Contacted the ConX team for Icons/artwork so where possible we can have a similar style. They are going to send over in a couple of weeks** | **Contacted the ConX team for Icons/artwork so where possible we can have a similar style. They are going to send over in a couple of weeks** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== New Concepts ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Filters on the sidebar - | ||
+ | * Show inactive - not a new concept for machine view - the default is off to not show old jobs | ||
+ | * Active today - Just show machines active that day | ||
+ | * Active Last # Days - Integer specifying number of days to filter back | ||
+ | * Low Battery - Limit List to showing trackers with low batteries (~below 33%)_ | ||
+ | * Assigned - Limit list to just machines with assigned trackers (maybe radio with UnAssigned?) | ||
+ | * Unassigned - Show only unassigned machines | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Graying/Distinguishing Machines with tracker assignment ** | ||
+ | Machines that aren't currently assigned a tracker should be distinguished visibly from machines with trackers visible. Previously they were obvious because of a noticeable blank spot where the tracker serial was on the list. Not only is this a waste of space but it places too much visual importance on the serial number that is even longer when we have to use the IMEI. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:web:accesswebstories:machinepageex1.png?600|}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Screen Description ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The screen can be divided into several parts. Left to right: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The breadcrumb of the back arrow, customer name, app-page, and subpage of machines. Ideally I could click on parts of the breadcrumb and go there although it may not be deep enough to justify it. | ||
+ | * Filter pane - Additive selections that control which machines are visible to a greater degree than we currently have which is limited to active/inactive. The idea is to be able to limit list size easily to just the focal points your ie: low battery, or active within so many days. | ||
+ | * The Machine list - | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||