Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- agtek_-_leica_synergy_notes [2018/10/10 15:53]
mikeclapp
+++ agtek_-_leica_synergy_notes [2018/11/07 23:40] (current)
mikeclapp [KMZ Export support for ConX]
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
   * With Upload to ConX set to Yes the unique part of the interface appears. With ConX the user has to:
-       * login/authenticate (can we cache the tokens/values? Are we doing a third party integration?)
+       * login/authenticate . The image matches the naming conventions of Conx ie Username. We have to display this everytime for changing but can store the remembered value if the user chooses to.(can we cache the tokens/values? Are we doing a third party integration?)
+       * {{::loginscreen.jpg?400|}}
        * Select the project (GET /api/one/v1/builders/{company uuid}/projects/?recursive=1) This is derivative from our existing project selection. It looks like creation of new projects is also API supported.
@@ Line 125: / Line 126: @@
 Possible rebranding/renaming to Icon Office mobile for Leica customers?
+====== Earthmover Tracking points from ConX =======
+The M20 job has both AGTEK trackers and the ConX Earthmover Ipad on CAT801 for 10-12-2018. The Track under "Track - Location History" looks like a series of points representing a track. There was some question of whether we could read these as tracks. The more that I look at the data compared to the same track we captured I realize that the lines are probably just a vector between the pickup and dump points. If I try to pick any of those points on the screen it looks like it actually goes to the single points at the end of the lines. Frankly I'd represent them as an icon with matching numbers for load and dump because the vectors add to the busyness.
+====== KMZ Export support for ConX =======
+ConX currently has limited support for KMZ. They don't support the image overlay object which precludes them from displaying plan sheets or cut/fill colors. Their intention is to do so since they already support KMZ linework, placemarks(?) and closed polygons. It doesn't appear that they support any html view of the property sheets either.
+===== AGTEK Export of KMZ to ConX =====
+The interface challenge for export is that the KMZ export already has an export to Access option and our

AGTEK R & D Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools