This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| access:access_server_2013_robustification_project [2013/04/05 18:41] mjallison [Possible Solutions] | access:access_server_2013_robustification_project [2013/04/05 19:02] (current) mjallison [Possible Solutions] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| * Most storage issues appear to be related to the Access Java Client, fix it. | * Most storage issues appear to be related to the Access Java Client, fix it. | ||
| * Track storage can be moved to S3, increasing the safety of track storage. | * Track storage can be moved to S3, increasing the safety of track storage. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Recommended Solution ===== | ||
| + | * TBD: Identify robustness goals, recovery speed, etc. to guide solution selection. | ||
| + | * Attend April 30 AWS conference to get briefed on more AWS tech. | ||
| + | * Document modern (2013) system architecture | ||
| + | * Document failover process (for manual recovery), recovery procedures for failure modes.  | ||
| + | * Modify AccessSupport tool to automate instance creation (from existing AMI-create snap of existing AMI, reattach EBS), recover EBS from snaps, repopulate DB from backup snap, | ||
| + | * Modify AccessSupport tool to copy snaps to another region to prep for region failover process.  | ||
| + | * Consider auto copy snaps to another region for backup.  | ||
| ===== Possible Track items to consider at the same time ===== | ===== Possible Track items to consider at the same time ===== | ||
| Likely only make these modifications when we rework a track product | Likely only make these modifications when we rework a track product | ||